Quality Control & Monitoring

Criterion 1: High Diploma Organization

Indicators: Preparation; Methodology, materials and resources; adaptation and translation.
Evidence: Deliverables of work packages (WP) 1, 2 and 6; accreditation applications for each university to their ministries (in the case of public universities) or rector´s office (in the case of private universities, WP1).

Criterion 2: Training

Indicators: Academic staff and students trainings.
Evidence: Deliverables of WP5

Criterion 3: Application and Implementation of the High Diploma

Indicators: High diploma application and implementation in Jordan and Palestine.
Evidence: Deliverables of WP6.

Criterion 4. Academic staff (trainers)

Indicators: the professional profile of academic staff and whether their teaching commitment is sufficient and suitable to the characteristics of the higher diploma. An additional indicator is the number of enrolled students.
Evidence: Timeline of teaching commitment and CV of each trainer.

Criterion 5. Material resources and services

Indicators: Material resources and their technological infrastructures allow for the development of educational activities as well as the acquisition of higher Diploma competencies; the internship has been planned according to foreseen aspects and is appropriate for the acquisition of higher diploma competences.
Evidence: Teaching/educational guides; description of the technological platform and other teaching and educational resources; list of participant organizations where the internship will take place; follow up reports of teachers in charge of the internships; list of students participating in the internship.

Criterion 6. Performance indicators

Indicators: Withdrawal rate; fail rate; success rate per teaching course; the success rate for earning the higher diploma.
Evidence: Reports regarding these rates.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive the latest news and updates delivered directly to your inbox.
No, thanks